Who Do You Root For?
Baby Girl and I settle in at night together. She does her homework in my bed, and lately, I have been resting. Because I am too tired to even read most nights, I have been watching re-runs on TV. Having gone through every Law & Order under the sun, I expanded my re-run viewing to include NCIS and Bones one or two nights a week. And then, we will watch this show.
Here's the thing about Baby Girl and me. Over the years, we have fine-tuned the pecking order of who we will root for on shows like American Idol, Amazing Race, or So You Think You Can Dance. We don't watch other reality shows (like Survivor). We generally don't like to see people being mean and many unscripted shows have an elements of having to be unkind to win. So we don't watch those. But on the talent contest-type shows, the order of who we root for generally is: Latinos, gays, nice/sweet parent-child or sibling pairs (such as on something like Amazing Race). If any of our first two choices offered are MEAN, then we go down the list with various sub-pecking-order "rules" we have somehow devised until we settle for someone to root for. (Compelling back story? We might be persuaded!) If the Latino person happens to be Mexican or Mexican-American, that trumps all. Always.
Baby Girl LOVES George Lopez. He now has a show on at 11:00 p.m. and she is ecstatic. She loves George because his humor is similar to Baby Girl's father and stories he tells of how he grew up, poor and Mexican. Baby Girl's dad can even perfect a Mexican accent a la George Lopez. It's like me slipping into a New York accent.
Demon Baby is reminded every day that some day he will be the first Mexican-American president of the United States. Of course, right now he says he wants to be the Tooth Fairy. Which DOES sound like a good gig. But perhaps president is in his future. Basically, I suppose like many people, who my kids root for is about the people you identify with, or the people who remind you of your friends and family. It's about pride. Now that Baby Girl is in Mean Middle School (nature of middle school, I am afraid) . . . she hears SO MUCH racism. Even Oldest Son has gotten sensitive about it. So she likes seeing Mexican-Americans who do well and "represent" for her identity. And whether athletes or various movie stars like to hear it or not, how they are depicted in the media does, indeed, make an impression on kids. Baby Girl has other role models, to be sure. Lots of them. But nonetheless, we root for people based on how we identify with them.
So it is with books. Most of the time, depending on genre, you are being asked, early on, to identify with the hero or heroine and to ROOT for them. I don't know a writer alive who doesn't, at times, walk a tricky line. "How smart alecky or bitchy or difficult or flawed can I make this character before readers are turned off and stop caring? Or actively DISLIKE the main character?" A show of hands, please?
We seem willing to forgive a lot of flaws--characters who drink too much or can't sustain relationships or gamble or sleep with someone who's inherently bad for them--IF their sense of humor or their smarts or their ability to save the world means we overlook the flaws and root for them anyway.
And so much of this all is subjective. Some of us, like Baby Girl, will choose to root for a character based on our own bias, or our own identity, or our own belief system, etc. If there are two mom characters and one is hippy-dippy and disorganized? Guess which one I am rooting for. NOT the Barbie mom. The OTHER one. The slightly nutty mom. In the end, most of the times readers are just going to give you so many words or pages to ensure we're rooting for who we are supposed to be rooting for. And betrayals of who we root for . . . readers aren't likely to tolerate.
So who do YOU root for? What kind of main character? As you create your own characters, are you aware of that likability factor? Of making sure your reader roots for who they are supposed to root for? Thoughts?

19 comments:
I like to root for the knight errant. The righteous vigilante. Shane, Travis Mcgee, Jack Reacher...
There are scores of them, I guess. Not sure why I like them so much. Maybe because they live life on their own terms and don't take crap from anybody.
Jude and I have the same tastes, I think. Travis McGee, Spenser, to name two. In the mythos of Campbell, I guess that is the fairly standard Outsider Hero, the one who's outside the system, but comes in to save the day. It's a particular archetype that appeals to teenage boys (and their grown-up versions, apparently), possibly because they (we) always feel outside the system. In Campbell's Hero's Journey the Outsider Hero is typically brought into the community at the end of the journey--think Han Solo, a fairly classic example, I think. The rogue, the outsider, who saves the day and becomes part of the community.
I root for the underdog, and if the underdog happens to be of a minority race, I love her even more. I think that's why I loved THE HELP so much -- the book was chock full of underdogs. In OLIVE KITTERIDGE, I rooted for every underdog in the book and Elizabeth Strout kept killing them off or had other bad things happen to them that they never recovered from -- a most frustrating book. I did NOT like protagonist Olive until the very end of the story, and had it not been a Pulitzer winner in my genre, I would not have finished the book, beautiful writing or not. In the end, though, I find I still think about the book and that blasted Olive.
Jude:
I don't see Travis McGee as righteous. He's a chauvinistic character . . . so I don't know--a knight implies something else to me. But vigilante, yeah, I see him as that.
E
Mark:
Ahh . . . I like Hans Solo.
E
Beth:
I have not read that Olive book and now you have me intrigued!
E
I like to root for the guy (usually guys, don't know why) who has to disband his previous belief system to do the right thing. I seem to do that over and over with characters. Of course the brain is a blank and I can't think of a character I've read who's done that, but I'm sure he's out there.
I'm not a big underdog rooter. I like capability, and even when they know it (and especially when their capability isn't enough and they have to stretch further).
Starbucks:
INTERESTING! That is a very specific take . . . and I have to say, I think that is someone I would root for too.
E
I root for characters who love, and who are maybe a bit misunderstood.
I would root for Han Solo any day of the week. It is my firm belief that the new three Star Wars movies could have been great if only they had been able to incorporate Harrison Ford or a Han Solo-like character.
I think the more flaws in a character, the better--because we all want to be redeemed for our mistakes. And if a character can be flawed and rise above to be heroic--wow. Hope for us all.
And I have a soft spot for any minority. My family tree is extremely eclectic on one side--filled with people of different race, religion, and sexual orientation--and not at all on the other side--white protestant descendants of the country's forefathers. I like the dichotomy.
I think we root for those in whom we see something of ourselves, someone who makes us believe that we too can overcome.
My son is half Italian and was raised without his father in my household of light-skinned, Irish/French Canadians. I think the only genes he got from me was inheriting double-jointed thumbs and my weird sense of humour. I can't tell you the number of times I've introduced him to coworkers to have them say "He's so dark. He looks nothing like you." They say this in front of him, like it's an okay thing to say. I've taken to reminding them that it wasn't a virgin birth and that another set of genes was in the mix.
Because of this "difference" (and I had never thought of it as one until people kept pointing it out to me) bonds instantly with Italians -- people who share his heritage and look just like him.
Amy:
I root for misfits more than the misunderstood, I think.
E
Heather:
My family tree is eccentric. Both sides. My kids' father's side is dysfunctional more than eccentric. And yes, I think there's a difference.
:-)
E
Colleen:
My kids have a wide assortment of friends/ethnicities around them. But I do know finding other Mexican-Americans is something that they are happy about.
True story . . . there was an off-color joke/ribbing occurring on my daughter's soccer team, and my daughter called the person out as sounding racist. The coach, bless him, said, "We're a team, and if you can't function as a unit, including ALL, then we won't have a team . . . I'll disband it. We INCLUDE all." I wish more coaches and things would help kids see how to be inclusive.
E
I tend to root for the person who is genuinely nice and often sh*t on.
Because I'm a person who really is genuinely nice and bends over backwards for people, only to frequently get walked over.
So in a way, I root for the underdog.
This is something I struggle with a lot. I tend to create characters who have similar fears, insecurities, and weaknesses as my readers. So sometimes I worry they're too human and too flawed, lol, or they come across as weak or something.
I'm not picky. Actually, I have a hard time watching reality shows because I feel badly for everyone. I have a hard time with lots of comedy for the same reason: comedy is quite tragic for the character/person.
Nadine:
I hear ya! Believe me . . .
E
Natasha:
I found Meet the Parents UNWATCHABLE for that reason. It was so mean at the nice character's expense . . . I found it painful.
E
I'm the same way with reality shows. I don't like watching mean people and prefer those based on someone's talent.
This post reminds me of a conversation I had years before I got together with my now husband. I've always preferred foreign men and this one friend got very upset about this. He said "if you had two men with the exact same jobs, same income, same beliefs, same everything, and the only difference was one was American and the other foreign, you'd choose the foreign guy?"
It was no question for me. Maybe I was Mexican in my previous life?
Post a Comment