A Tale of Two Manuscripts and the Kings of Leon
So I was asked to read two manuscripts (not by any followers of this blog, so breathe easy). One was charming. It had a concept perhaps done before, but the writing was cute and sparkly with characters I cared about. The other . . . to be honest, I read it three weeks ago, and I cannot recall a single thing about any of the characters except one person's profession. Occasionally, dialogue was enough to make me smirk or laugh (in a good way, it was supposed to be witty), but . . . in the end, I finished and thought, "Why did this novelist write this? What did he have to say?" It felt like a big blank to me.
Which brings me to my new obsession:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHhhcKxflMY
I was listening to this song yesterday with Oldest Daughter and recounting a Rolling Stone article in which the journalist said that Caleb was, as the band was forming, encouraged to add studio musicians, and instead insisted on his two brothers and a cousin. It could have been career suicide (he was an unknown), but the boys' background in the Pentocostal church and strange upbringing (no formal schooling; just traveling in an Oldsmobile to revivals with their preacher-father) probably meant the family was who he felt comfortable around. To which Oldest Daughter replied, "It was him they wanted. His voice is unique and no one in music right now sounds quite like him." And she's right. There is, beyond garage boogie--Southern gothic--grunge metal something, an unusual quality to his voice. The label wanted Caleb. And if it meant the other boys coming along for the ride, that was okay.
Which brings me to the tale of the two manuscripts.
I have conceived of, easily eight different ideas this year for books. Probably more. All "hook" concepts, playing with voice. I don't KNOW, but they all feel pretty unique. All high-concept. But it's a question of voice and follow-through. I mean, concept is okay--but what are you going to DO with the concept. As I write and explore, I am constantly looking for what's different. What makes my story unusual and why am I the one to write it?
The type of music the Kings of Leon make has been done before. But not quite the same way. So it was with the manuscripts. One somehow took a premise of a mystery chick-lit and made it her own. The other . . . I can't think of anything in the voice that made me pause and think, "This guy is fresh. This is original."
There's a lot of chatter about bringing your A-game now that the market is depressed, and the book biz is scrambling to reinvent itself. I would hope (though I know it's not true entirely) that it means everyone is nailing the basics of storytelling as far as back story dumps and characterization, and plotting, and conflict. But A-game, I am consistently feeling, is that not quite quantifiable voice that makes an editor pause and think, "This is fresh."
Thoughts? Do you think uniqueness is elusive? What's special about what you're bringing to your A-game?
