Therapy
I imagine that a good critique group is something like therapy or analysis. I've always thought an analyst would run shrieking from the room if he or she met me, but my critique group seems to stick it out--we have, in one form or another for 15 years.
But here's why I think that they are similar. I presume if you go to analysis, you go thinking, "Here am I, here is my mess, now help me spend six months of my life guiding me so that I emerge being far less of a mess." I imagine when you start with an analyst, you wonder if you will even get along, and then at some point, some trust is established and you get to say, "Okay, I walked through the door saying THIS was my mess . . . but guess what, dude, THIS is the really dark stuff . . . THIS is actually my mess."
And if you have every completed a novel . . . I imagine that scenario is somewhat familiar, since it's never a straight shot all the way through and there are times you wonder if the thing can even be salvaged.
I'm playing with a proposal because it's "that time" in my author cycle. And I am all over the map with it. And it dawned on me that thank the sea monkey gods (makes sense if you read yeasterday's post) I trust my group because bringing a new concept is rather like saying, "All right, here is my vulnerability . . . do you think I'm nuts?"
And in the end, a therapist cannot fix anyone. Neither can a crit group. All they can do is talk you in from the ledge if you need it and force you to get honest with yourself.
Thoughts?
