Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Special

I had lunch with an editor a couple of years ago. A really brash guy making a name for himself, funny, intelligent. He also has two kids and he told me, "I try to get it through their heads that my wife and I adore them, their grandparents love them dearly, but once they get out of high school or college, absolutely no one cares. It's a cold, cruel world. You have to own your inner specialness but realize everyone else thinks they themselves are special, too."

And he's probably right. I raise each of my kids to know, deep down, they are extraordinary. But every other parent on the planet thinks the same of THEIR kids. And so when the time comes to make their way in the world, my kids and everyone else's have to do it on their own. Their friends may cheer their small victories, their big victories, their parents may brag to the nieghbors, but after a while, the world doesn't hand out very many gold stars.

The same thought can be had for your manuscript. I wonder if the average writer realizes what thousands of unsolicited manuscripts LOOK LIKE. You know those HUGE canvas bins the Post Office pushes around? Think of dozens of them FILLED to the top with slush. Hundreds and thousands of manuscripts. Every one of those authors thinks they have a gold star manuscript.

We each think our character is clever and funny or brooding and interesting. But in reality . . . I remain a firm believer in the hook. You have to get an editor interested because of some concept so different that they really haven't encountered it before. Or there has to be something there that elevates you. Otherwise . . . it's like the hundreds of thousands of college grads each June who go out into the workplace and realize, that yes, every single other person they are competing with has that piece of paper too. So what lands them the job? That charisma. That charm, that something extra that when they walk in the room, people notice. That unusual internship. Whatever it is . . . it's something special.

A woman once told me about her book at a conference. It was a perfectly ordinary pitch. Acceptable. Nothing that rang any alarms as being outside of marketable. But nothing I could even remember once she stopped speaking. I always think, "Give your agent something to work with . . . Give an editor something they can go into committee with that will make everyone around the table sit up a little straighter and pay attention."

Here's the other thing. You can't say "It's the writing." Because no editor or agent can hand-sell to ten thousand readers or book buyers and say, "Yes, you've heard this before, but this is about the writing."

Thoughts?

27 comments:

Zoe Winters 8:52 AM, October 21, 2008  

You know, I read a lot of books, and I almost never read anything that I haven't encountered before.

Of course I tend to rave about a book when I do. But most of what's published really isn't all that different.

Maybe it feels different to an editor or someone who goes through slush every day but as a reader, I see the same stories over and over.

Zoe Winters 8:54 AM, October 21, 2008  

I'm sure there are others that read more than me, but I've read 37 novels so far this year. The goal is 50. I've got to get my fiction reading butt in gear if I want to make it.

Erica Orloff 8:57 AM, October 21, 2008  

Hi Zoe:
Hmm . . . I don't know. Maybe because of what I read, I tend to think Neil Gaiman doesn't write like any other person. Same with Maragret Atwood. I defy anyone to even come up with the plot for Blind Assassin. Astounding!

In commercial fiction, yeah. When taken as a whole, it's ALL been done before. But I think then it's that "something" about the character. Just a few shades different enough that it lends the entirety a feeling of newness. I have no doubt the first James Patterson thrillers felt fresh because his character was an African American forensic psychologist, living with his great-grandmother on the fringes of a bad neighborhood with his little girl, who refused to leave the area . . . who felt a kinship there. The precise combination, I think, felt different. Serial killers, done before, of course. But the guy hunting them felt new to readers.

E

Amy Sue Nathan 9:08 AM, October 21, 2008  

I agree, it's not always the story, it's the little part of the story that makes it stand out, the thing that makes you think "Ooooh!"

After that, it's the way it's executed.

I think that sometimes a great idea - that high concept (am still wrapping my brain around that idea) can sometimes take a writer far, because there are editors and rewrites and even ghost writers to make up for lack of talent and finesse.

Yes or no? Not that I'd do anything less than my own best -- and hope it meets all the criteria for great idea meets great writing.

Mark Terry 9:16 AM, October 21, 2008  

I suspect it's not definable, which is why it's so difficult to do it as a writer (at least for me). It's probably not just "hook" either, although that's really helpful.

I think of some really odd books that have come out over the last 10 years--the ones about the dinosaur detective, and one about a paranoid schizophrenic detective. Those are hooks (weird ones, perhaps), but aside from the hooks, they had something else going for them.

It might just be: really great characters.

The hooks make them sell, but the really great characters gives them legs.

Erica Orloff 9:19 AM, October 21, 2008  

Hi Amy:

That's the thing . . . stepping away from your book and seeing does it have that "something."

And yes, it has to intersect with professionalism and all the rest of it--writing, execution. But I think NOT having the special factor can doom an inherently good writer.

E

Erica Orloff 9:21 AM, October 21, 2008  

Mark:
I agree. The Patterson example in the comments section I think points to that and I know there are dozens of others. I mean, take the detective genre. It's that unforgettable character. Fletch was hugely successful partly because he was the classic anti-hero protagonist that was memorable. The twists weren't super shocking, the cases not extraordinary. It was the something special.

E

Jude Hardin 9:33 AM, October 21, 2008  

I think the answer is D: ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Some agents and editors will tell you that good writing trumps all, and I tend to believe that. High concept is cool, but, you know, a million great ideas fly around Hollywood like confetti every day and most of them never get developed. Yeah, you need a hook, a little one-liner to prompt initial interest, but after that it's all in the execution. You have to have a good idea, a stout plotline, multidimensional characters, and solid writing skills. All of the above, I think, to even have a shot in today's competitive publishing climate.

Erica Orloff 9:50 AM, October 21, 2008  

Jude:
I agree it's an intersection. I do think you burden your agent (not you, but "you" as in all writers) when you say, "Here, sell my mystery about a cop." And it's serviceable. Good even. Well-written. But there's nothing about the hero/heroine that really is memorable enough. And I don't think the best writing can overcome that. I am sure there are exceptions. But I think you have to at least give an agent that "something" (however intangible) in the first place beyond ordinary.
E

Jude Hardin 10:23 AM, October 21, 2008  

I know what you mean, Erica. Then again, I think the hook, or whatever it is that makes a manuscript stand out, really needs to arise organically from the story and the characters. It can't just be some cool sounding gimmick that's been tacked on. It can't just be, "Yoohoo, look at me, look at how different I am."

Gotta keep it real.

Erica Orloff 10:33 AM, October 21, 2008  

Jude;
Totally agree. Therein lies the challenge. :-)
E

Spy Scribbler 10:45 AM, October 21, 2008  

I've read so many unpublished writers that truly rock. Good writing is truly, truly, truly not much more than average. And every idea has been done a thousand times.

I think about this a lot, honestly. I don't want to compare myself to other writers, but I have no idea why people read my stories. It's bewildering to me. The only answer I've managed to come up with, after the basics of craft, is somehow, it's about connection and understanding.

Kath Calarco 11:24 AM, October 21, 2008  

I don't know about hooks. They're important when trying to get the attention of an agent or editor, but I have to believe you need great writing to back up the hook. Too many times I've picked up books based on their "blurb," a/k/a "hook" only to be disappointed by the writing style.

One other thing to consider, or so I've heard, is to keep in mind what's selling. That aspect must be important or otherwise there wouldn't be that standard line "not selling right now" in rejection letters.

I'd rather have great luck over a great hook.

Erica Orloff 11:25 AM, October 21, 2008  

spy:
I really do agree, in that I guess there's got to be that "thing" that makes you different. The competition is fierce.
E

Erica Orloff 11:26 AM, October 21, 2008  

kath:
Wise advice.

Sarah Laurenson 12:06 PM, October 21, 2008  

Perhaps it's like cake.

The hook is the icing and/or the decoration. It's what first attracts you to the cake. First glance from a different angle will tell you if the cake is flat or has substance. Then you slice into it and take a look at what's inside. Do the characters look good? Are they your flavor? And the writing? Is it consistent throughout the slice? And yummy?

Can you tell I'm off sugar? *sigh*

Melanie Hooyenga 12:24 PM, October 21, 2008  

Great analogy Erica, and I like Sarah's too. :)

Erica Orloff 12:43 PM, October 21, 2008  

sarah:
Brilliant!!!! You should blog about it!!
E

Rick 1:11 PM, October 21, 2008  

Hi Erica! What a wonderful blog you have here. It's like an online writing course. I enjoy it tremendously.

Zoe Winters 1:23 PM, October 21, 2008  

Mark, was the dinosaur detective a detective that studied dinosaurs or a dinosaur that was a detective? That one has me stumped.

Erica Orloff 1:41 PM, October 21, 2008  

Hi Rick:
Thanks . . . it's a nice group of writers and lurkers. :-)

E

Anonymous 1:43 PM, October 21, 2008  

Erica, I'm a believer in voice. Concepts, storylines all hinge on it imo. And when someone comes out with an original voice, I get chills. I always think, now this is truly special. I love reading sentences that make me think, I've never read a combination of words quite like this. I sometimes get teary-eyed from the beauty. Who knew?

Erica Orloff 1:59 PM, October 21, 2008  

ladonna:
I think voice and concept were reasons for the success of book like The Secret Life of Bees and The Lovely Bones.

E

Ello - Ellen Oh 5:00 PM, October 21, 2008  

I think this post was dead on. But also eye opening. You are absolutely right that the concept has to be memorable - even more so than the writing. I mean look at the slew of high concept books that may not be written really well that have been blockbusters. But it is hard to know what that concept is that will get an editors attention.

Erica Orloff 5:51 PM, October 21, 2008  

Hi Ello:
The lsuch is an avalanche (which is why I think YOUR unique book will stand out--it's already garnered you an agent!)

E

Robin 7:10 PM, October 21, 2008  

Oh, that's what they mean by a hook. I was going to run around the lobby of Simon and Schuster, and see if anyone noticed me. Plan B was that I'd only agree to put on my clothes if they gave me a book contract.

Erica Orloff 8:05 PM, October 21, 2008  

robin:
LOL! That'll work.

:-)
E


  © Blogger template Brooklyn by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP