The First Novel
It is very neat, in the course of this blog or at conferences or whatever, to meet writers at every single stage of the journey, from grizzled veterans (can I call him grizzled?) to total newbies and everything in between.
But I have to say, there is a particular line in the sand that I "think" sometimes marks a completely new writer from those with a few novels under their belt--sold or unsold--and it has to do with that "drawer" novel. (The one you stick in a drawer never to see the light of day.) Because most people I meet working on their first novel expect to sell it. They have a lot of questions about how to sell, how to get an agent, and so on. And they are filled with the kind of fantastic excitement your first novel SHOULD be full of.
My first novel was written and completed when I was twenty-two or twenty-three. I sent out exactly ONE query, to Ruth Cavin at St. Martin's. She requested the full. She kept it six months or so. She sent back a very detailed letter of how she bought mainly mysteries and my novel was a psychological thriller--a good one, but not right for her line. I never sent it anywhere else. I didn't research editors looking for psychological thrillers. I think at that point in my life, I was content to have written "The End" on something. I stuck it in a drawer. I have it here. Printed out on my old dot matrix printer!
So I wrote about 100 pages of another novel--a romance. I abandoned it because my heart really wasn't in it. I sold a couple of short stories with an edgier voice.
And then I wrote about 100 pages of a third novel, which remains unfinished, a love triangle about a priest, a guy in the IRA, and the granddaughter of an Irish-American with deep pockets who funded some of the IRA's doings. And then . . .
Into my head came the very insistent voice of Cassie Hayes, and I wrote Spanish Disco inside of a few months, and it sold to the fifth house it was sent to, and now I'm 25 novels later. Which sounds like a fairly straight line, but it was anything but, I suppose.
But here's the thing.
Along the way I learned some things that I didn't know when I wrote my first novel. Like, when I wrote my first novel, I assumed you thought up this fabulous first sentence, something like "It was a dark and stormy night . . ." :-) And then you just wrote your novel until you got to "The End."
I didn't realize that very often your beginning in at Chapter Four after you regurgitate all that back story you thought was so important. I didn't realize EVERY page had to be a page turner. I didn't realize, most of all, the art of storytelling. Because I knew how to dream up some really cool characters--three-dimensional at that. And I knew how to place them into a plot. But I didn't realize that's not enough to tell a story. That there is an art to picking and choosing scenes, moving ahead in time to advance your story, and not telling EVERY single little character detail that happens to pop into your brain. I am STILL learning that lesson, as last week, my critique group told me to cut a chapter--and they were totally right. It's completely out of place.
I realized, bottom line, since that first novel, that not everything that flies from my head to my computer is publishable. That some books are really learning tools, because all the writing teachers in the world can tell you things, but there's nothing like that Ah-ha you have on your own.
So what have you learned from your first novel? Finished or unfinished--doesn't matter. What are your lessons?

28 comments:
I didn't realize that very often your beginning in at Chapter Four after you regurgitate all that back story you thought was so important.
I'm getting ready (this week!) to pitch my second novel. It begins at what used to be chapter seven.
Stephen:
I have done that a couple of times now and I'm still surprised when it happens, LOL!
I didn't realize that the story isn't always what you thought it was when you started.
When I started I didn't realize (and I mean this humbly) how much my writing would improve over 300 pages and 3 years.
I didn't realize that at some point my first novel could end up as a test drive for fiction.
The beginning of my novel was once page 100.
I never revised my drawer novel. I got the sense, after I wrote THE END, that it was indeed, a drawer novel. Not that I don't love it--sometimes it whispers to me in the middle of the night. But so much of the learning, for me, anyway, happens withing the revision process, that I'm wondering if my second novel is actually my first. Wondering if I should revise the drawer novel, and see what I learn from that. Wondering what I am going to learn when I revise my third, or draft my fourth.
Wondering when my learning will push my skill past the publishing threshold. And whether I will know when that happens. :)
Hi Amy:
I think of a first novel and very much groping around to find your voice and find your storytelling, but it's just a rite of passage you have to go through as a fiction writer.
Hi Heather:
I totally hear you. I look at some of my unfinished manuscripts and know I learned something from each of them . . . .
I learned some of the same things from my first novel. While it did garner a publisher's attention (and was ultimately rejected), it was such a newbie effort. I quickly put it away and remember it now only as "practice."
What I'm finding is that through the writing/rewriting of my second novel, I've thought this could really be the one. I've built it up in my head, and patted myself on the back prematurely. But I'm coming to see it could more practice, that's all, and maybe I'm to get no more out of it than that. It could be time to move on.
I've got to write just to write, to get better, and see where that takes me. It just needs to be better--not the best ever.
That's my biggest lesson.
You're one smart lady! :)
Amy's smart, too. *waves* I just read her comment, and this stuck out:
"I didn't realize that at some point my first novel could end up as a test drive for fiction."
Interesting, because the first novel I wrote I basically sent out to one agent who turned it down with a critique and I put it away and went to work on the next. I did it for the wrong reasons--I didn't know any better--but ultimately it was the right decision.
I think one of the things I've learned over the years is: less is more (unless more is needed).
Helpful, huh?
Janna:
I liked that comment from Amy, too!
Mark:
LOL! Yeah. I learned that too. :-) Not that it makes any sense until you grasp that lesson yourself.
I'm totally rewriting my current WIP because after writing the end, and sending it to some beta readers that the more compelling character was not my protagonist, but one of the secondary ones -- it's HER story. Thus the subplot has now become the main plot and the old main plot is now the subplot. Hooray for beta readers, they are SO right. So, I learned sometimes I need to hold my novel lightly and be willing to flip things around.
Beth:
I'm chopping a whole chapter from my last crit group because it just doesn't belong there. I also have learned to hang back and be open.
My first novel was the stepping stone to learning. I knew nothing about writing a novel and even less about publishing. Its size was epic - just guessing, but I think it was over 900 pages. But like a first love, I revisit it, thinking that if I change this and that it could be really something.
I call it authorial discovery. The best way I've found to tell my short story writers in conference sessions is that short stories don't get prologues or epilogues.
My first adult novel has been revised to death. I'd say I've almost revised the soul right out of it. But I learned A LOT from it, so I don't regret it. The biggest thing I've learned, and it's a very personal lesson, that revising old bad writing is way harder than drafting better writing from the start. But I had to write a million words to competently draft.
I can't tell you how excited I was last week to have my critique group tell me to ADD a chapter. I drafted SCAR very sparingly, only a year in did I add in the other POVs. And they've liked every addition so far. To me that's been a HUGE leap in my writing, that they like what I've added without wanting me to cut a great deal.
Hey Mikey! He likes it!
HAH! My first novel? ROFL! Let's see:
1. Until you have, like, ten books under your belt, don't sell anything to be serially published until it's completely finished. And even after ten books, only do it if desperate for money.
2. Do not, under any circumstances, switch heroes in the middle of a story.
3. Cutesy names are horrid (but hilarious ten years later).
4. If you do publish your first work, then for god's sake, use a pseudonym.
Hi there,
QUESTION: Spanish Disco was your first published novel. How much of you is in "Cassie Hayes"?
Since I haven't had the pleasure of reading any of your other work, do all your books have a character that is similar to you, or is that just something an author does with their first novel?
Just curious. :-)
Kath:
I do think first novels are like a first love. :-)
starbucks:
Amen to that. Revising crap . . . not easy.
Natasha:
Some good lessons there, LOL!
BLD:
In real life, I can be just a mouthy and sardonic and flippant. A lot of similarities . . . but over TIME, becoming more Buddhist in my approach to life, I strive to be less edgy, so to speak.
In Do They Wear High Heels in Heaven . . . i think the character of Lily is similar to me as a mother--a sort of slightly older, wiser Cassie in some ways.
The Roofer's Ava is a lot like me. Beyond that . . . not to much. I think I adopted characters much less like me the longer I wrote.
My first novel taught me I wasn't half as good as I thought I was. Plot wise I believe it is still my strongest story but boy did I screw up the telling of it.
Unlike you I tried like hell to sell it and actually came closer than I have with any of the others. Editor from Kensington took a liking to both it and me but the marketing team didn't feel anything about it would make it stand out so they shot me down at the acquisition board.
I've never gotten that close in the decade since so i suppose that women's fiction novel also taught me how tough this business is.
Travis:
But I would say I think you now have one of the most unique voices in the blogosphere, so obviously . . . you got something . . . just finding the right project/editor match.
ROFL Natasha!
My first novel taught me a) that I could finish a novel and b) that I like this novel-writing thing.
Melanie:
LOVE that!
Yes, typing "the end" on your first longer body of work is amazing!
My first novel taught me that I could actually write an entire novel. It gave me the confidence that I could write books and all the subsequent books have been easier to write (in the sense that I knew I could finish them).
I still love the premise of my first novel, but I don't think it should ever see the light of day unless major rewriting happens.
Ooh, and my first novel also taught me that if you send 80 queries and don't get a SINGLE request for a partial or a full, you might want to rework your query. :)
Nadine:
LOL on the 80 queries. We live and learn! And YES! Learning you CAN write something that length? It's amazing!
Acid flashback to my 15 year old self. Ouchie.
Nameless, as you could probably tell from my frantic posts back then, was doomed to be a clustersuck of badly written good ideas, and horribly written bad ideas from the start. All 367 pages of it.
There are still parts that I'm deeply proud of, and ideas that I'm planning to use. But was a book mutant, that stole my heart, and possibly part of my kidney.
I suppose I learned that it doesn't all happen at once. And that goes for anyone.
Post a Comment