Tuesday, October 16, 2007

More Editing How-To's--Life Speeding By

Since my blog post of two days ago generated so much discussion (and great tips and word lists for myself--thanks everyone!), I decided to post on another editing pet peeve.

There is nothing mroe satisfying to the secret, lurking English teacher in me than slashing a red line through an entire page. Whip out the pen and voila . . . the page is gone. I do it often when editing authors . . . and I know they cringe. But . . . sometimes I just have to. And one of the biggest things that will get me joyously slicing through a page is scene setting.

Why?

Scene setting has a time and a place. For instance, in THE ROOFER, when Ava went into John's bar, in a scene-setting, she discussed the nicotine-encrusted (and I DO mean encusted) walls, the moosehead above the bar that had turned sooty black from smokers, the Hiroshima cloud of smoke hovering above everyone, the single light bulb in the bathroom, the vague smell of vomit in the air. It was time to set the scene of Hell's Kitchen. Scene setting wasn't appropriate in chapter one--that was an Irish wake. The most important part of that scene was the Irish wake itself--as a writer can't assume everyone has been to one. That wasn't the PLACE to explore Hell's Kitchen. I had to exhibit patience, even though Hell's Kitchen was one of the most improtant features of the book. But the time for that was the "downtime" start of the next chapter when Ava and Tom went for a drink.

In general, the most common time I slice with red pen, especially, in scene-setting is when life is SPEEDING by. What do I mean? If a detective and her partner walk into a crime scene, and the book is written from her POV, and as they enter the building, its walls awash in blood from a serial killer, and a man is fleeing the building, and the cop and her partner give pursuit, I don't care HOW good her power of observation is as a detective, from 100 yards, she is not going to notice the most minute details of her suspect (like eye color if it's dark), and she is not going to take the TIME to notice the chintz chair, the magazines on the coffee table, the knick-knacks on the shelves of the dead person's home. It's just not going to happen because that detective will be out of there in less than five seconds. Her adrenaline will be rushing. It isn't time for scene setting, it isn't time for heavy description--all that will pull a reader out of the scene. It's time to MOVE. Life is speeding by and all the rest of that "stuff" that writers sometimes love to describe can come LATER.

Thoughts? Time and place?

23 comments:

Spy Scribbler 9:21 AM, October 16, 2007  

I just love this series of posts, Erica. :-) The balance of dialogue and description and just plain prose (?) has always been a tough one for me. My characters end up talking with each other a lot, but not doing anything.

I'm pretty sure I could use to do more scene setting, LOL. (I just LOVED that description in The Roofer!)

Erica Orloff 9:59 AM, October 16, 2007  

Hi Spy:
I actually write so character-driven, I ignore scene setting alot--or feel like I do. But I think it's also that I am very conscious of the fact that in reality, when action is going on, we don't take time to notice this or that--it's not appropriate to bog down the scene that that point.
E

Edie Ramer 12:28 PM, October 16, 2007  

I like to ground the reader in a place as soon as possible, but I'm skimpy on the scene setting details. I've gotten better at if in my wip, but like you say, there are times the setting details won't be noticed.

At my chapter meeting this Saturday, we're talking about revisions. I'll tell them about your series of editing posts. This is just what they're looking for.

Erica Orloff 12:40 PM, October 16, 2007  

Hi Edie:
Wonderful . . . have a good chapter meeting. :-)

And yes, place vs. scene-setting . . . we can know where it's taking place, but we don't need to get bogged down in intricate details unless the scene really calls for it.

It all goes back to every word and detail having meaning, and counting for the story, verus simply taking up sapce on the page.

Amie Stuart 1:12 PM, October 16, 2007  

I think it's harder to make scene setting feel natural when you write in first person--and I do a lot! But thank you from the bottom of my heart for this.

You've blogged about one of my BIGGEST pet peeves! You can't see someone's eyecolor from across a crowded room (*gaaaaaa*). And I hate books that have lots of scene setting at the beginning -- unless it's appropriate and adds to the scene. Most of the time it doesn't. Get to the action already
*Sigh*

Erica Orloff 1:29 PM, October 16, 2007  

Hi Amie:
Glad to oblige--LOL!

And yes, yes, yes. Because I write for Red Dress Ink--and a lot of that is "chick lit" and that first-person, snappy kind of writing, it's doubly hard to set scenes. People living in their own house or their own lives . . . they don't have to describe things . . . they "know" it. It's not terribly natural. Same with decribing what a character looks like in first person. Too many methods feel "device-y."
E

Jude Hardin 2:17 PM, October 16, 2007  

I recently read Persuader by Lee Child. I think he's a great writer, but sometimes his descriptive details during an action scene are just...over the top. Almost to the point of absurdity, especially when the book is in 1st person.

I get bored with description when I'm reading--and when I'm writing--so my books naturally end up lean on that end. Sometimes I have to go back and add some, but I guess that's better than having too much.

Great post, Erica.

Ewoh Nairb 1:05 PM, October 17, 2007  

Thanks for another great post Erica.

I definitely leave most of my scene setting up to the reader's imagination... actually to the point of being spartan in my details.

I am in the process of fixing that, but this post is a great reminder for me not to go overboard.

Michelle Diener 12:44 PM, October 18, 2007  

I'm VERY skimpy on the setting description. Too skimpy, according to some of my CPS :) . I also never describe what my characters are wearing, for some reason. I actually love clothes in real life, but my characters are too busy to notice things like that. Unless its really usual.

Michelle Diener 1:04 PM, October 18, 2007  

Grrr. UNusual. (Blush).

Anonymous 3:24 AM, October 26, 2007  

XhoXDZ Your blog is great. Articles is interesting!

Anonymous 1:59 PM, October 26, 2007  

4NWnFz Wonderful blog.

Anonymous 2:59 PM, October 26, 2007  

EHMdmC Wonderful blog.

Anonymous 3:13 PM, October 26, 2007  

Thanks to author.

Anonymous 3:30 PM, October 26, 2007  

actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.

Anonymous 3:09 PM, October 27, 2007  

Magnific!

Anonymous 3:59 PM, October 27, 2007  

Good job!

Anonymous 10:33 AM, October 28, 2007  

Wonderful blog.

Anonymous 2:07 AM, October 30, 2007  

Hello all!

Anonymous 5:24 AM, October 30, 2007  

Thanks to author.

Anonymous 9:16 AM, October 30, 2007  

Magnific!

Anonymous 2:25 PM, October 31, 2007  

AZIGil actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.

Anonymous 2:52 PM, October 31, 2007  

Wonderful blog.


  © Blogger template Brooklyn by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP