What Do You Need?
If the comments after my last post are any indication, the readers of my blog need sex. But that's not what we're going to talk about today. Oh . . . maybe a little. (I can't control your comments . . . so . . . )
Next Wednesday, a national magazine is flying people in from NYC to shoot me. As in a portrait, not guns. Apparently, they send one photographer, one assistant to said photographer, hair and makeup. And yesterday, the utterly lovely woman who is corresponding with me over this photoshoot, wrote me an email asking, "Would you like me to send a stylist?"
Have you spit out your coffee yet? I could have gotten a little snarky and written back, "Why? To choose between the ten identical black shirts hanging in my closet, or the three identical white blouses from the Gap?" Instead, I did what any self-respecting woman with really bad clothes does. I called Oldest Daughter, whose wardrobe drips with labels like Ralph Lauren, Juicey Couture, Chanel, Steve Madden, Dolce and Gabanna, and Coach. She lives for clothes, and as a perfect teeny little size, she always looks incredible. Her response? "Hell yeah, have them send a stylist." Then, "Oh good, let's go shopping."
Now, just to be clear, I have a bunch of fancy clothes for signings and book parties, but this isn't what the photoshoot requires. I need something nice, but casual. And having been shot for a couple of magazines before, I know they like "color" not black. So I wrote back, "Yeah, in some pathetic turn of events in my life, turns out I need someone to dress me."
I do. And that is when being utterly honest with oneself comes in handy. I know what I need.
And here we go . . . back to the writing. You see . . . in my writers' group, I have a brilliant writer who, when I meander, hauls my meandering writing ass back on the trail. I have an equally brilliant woman who can spot a cliche from 100 pages off. She also has a way with the poetry of words and description that awes me. I suppose they think I bring something to the table, too, or we wouldn't still be meeting all these years later. I know what I need. My guess is they know what they need.
I meet writers who don't believe in critique partners and groups. And that's fine. But then, truly, the need for self-honesty is even stronger. Like people who quit drinking or shooting up without A.A. or N.A. Can it be done? Sure. Absolutely. But without a bunch of people to tell your sorry ass when you're being an ass? Makes it more difficult, I suppose. We all find ways to delude ourselves. Our blind spots.
I sometimes smile (all right, I sometimes smirk) when I see people offering editing services. Because some of them have no business doing so. Editing is an art. You often get what you pay for. And just because someone has a degree in English doesn't mean they are capable. I've been an editor for 20 years. A ghostwriter. I've written 20+ books, have contracts for 7 more. But . . . I STILL need an editor. I still need my critique group. I still need someone to seize my pretty little phrases sometimes and say, "Yeah, this is really beautiful . . . but it doesn't belong here."
Don't delude yourself. As humans, we all need something. As writers, we all do, too. The fearless person looks in the mirror and says, "I know what I need" not "I can do it all by myself."
So . . . what do you need?

38 comments:
I need my CPs too. They are the best. They find the weak places in my plots and my characters' motivations. And awkward phrasings that I miss. I take their advice about 90% of the time.
That sounds like a fun experience with the magazine. I hope you'll tell us when it's out. I'll run out and buy an issue.
Oh, how FUN! I love getting photographed, or at least I did when I was skinny, LOL. Will you tell us every single detail?
Good lord, that's a question. How am I going to answer it briefly?!
While I'm writing something, I only show my stuff to DH, who has only two jobs: first, to tell me if I'm getting weird or going in a really bad direction, and secondly, to tell me it's great and to keep going. (And submit to such questions as: Why did you laugh? Where are you? And You're frowning. What's happening now? How did you feel about this? What did this make you think?) All of which have him barking at me to go wander the stacks and let him read in peace.
I'm too impressionable and too much of a people-pleaser to show my work to someone until I know what it's about. Which, sadly, is rarely until I'm pretty much finished.
But then? Definitely I need help. I'm grateful for anyone who can keep me from making a fool of myself, LOL. As a profession, I have a total crush on editors. Maybe not so much copyeditors, but I can definitely say I respect them, LOL.
Congrats on the magazine thing. That's really cool!
I need people around me with the same motivation and momentum as me. Does that make sense? I have been in writing groups and classes where no one is serious about their book or project -- I think when I meet someone on the same track -- it's inspiring.
I need all of the above.
And probably therapy. =)
And, yes. Definitely tell us where and when to get the mag!
Congrats on the publicity coming your way, Erica. Awesome!
I contracted a professional coverage service for my screenplay. The price was reasonable, and I wanted an unbiased opinion from someone active in Hollywood before sending it to my agent. We'll see how it goes.
Your critique group sounds great, Erica, but I still think most of them are a waste of time. I think what Spy does, sharing first with one person (what Stephen King refers to as your Ideal Reader) is usually the best way to go.
Congrats, Erica! Let us know when we can go out and check your pic in the magazine.
Hi Edie:
Yes . . . seeking out my weaknesses. They are good at that. They also give me support in the moments when I-Suck-itis is rampant.
E
Hi Spy:
Will tell you. Promise. It won't be out until May though.
And I HATE having my picture taken. But I decided to just be open to this experience. Even someone dressing me. LOL!
And Spy, I hear you . . . for years and years the only person who ever saw my writing was . . . ME.
E
Hi Amy:
Definitely hear you. My writing companions are definitely on the same path as far as the level of professionalism we put toward it.
E
lainey:
LOL!
So are you going on the record as needing sex? ;-)
E
Um ... isn't a coverage service basically a critique group for hire?
Jude:
I am glad you, as always, have your opinions, but I find it amazing you can dismiss "most" of them out of hand as a "waste of time." I've been in this biz a long time, and a random survey of the people I know in the biz doing well, getting pubbed, etc., a majority have CPs and/or are in writers' groups online or in-person. Not all. But many of my friends. Clearly, they work for a LOT of writers.
Like anything, there are good and bad, but you get out what you put in. If you see the group straying from its mission, then it's up to you as group member to pull everyone's ass back on the trail. If you are only going for validation--then like anyone with ego issues, the ego issues are at fault, not the group.
I would never wholesale say to someone "I think without a group your chances of getting published are doomed" any more than I would expect someone who has opted to go it alone as a writer to deem "most" a waste.
Hi Michele:
Will do. :-)
E
I need to remove the delete button from my keyboard.
heather:
I am going to duct tape over it on your computer. :-) Treasure your words.
E
the readers of my blog need sex.
You miss one day and you miss it ALL!
Hi Amie:
Yeah. You really have to watch it with this crew.
:-)
E
I hate having my picture taken. I sit there looking at the pictures wondering, if the camara adds ten pounds, how many camaras were actually on me? Sheesh!:D
I have critical Ideal Readers too, and I love Stephen King's book On Writing.
I learn so much from my editors and have so much respect for them.
Have fun with your photo shoot and a great Mom/Daughter bonding opportunity! I'm sure it will rock her world to get to dress her mom up! :)
colleen:
I think she's my Dr. Frankenstein.
LOL!
E
Your critique group sounds great, Erica, but I still think most of them are a waste of time.
You're right, Erica. I have absolutely no credentials to criticize "most" of anything. Allow me to rephrase:
Your critique group sounds great, Erica, but every one I have ever been involved with or monitored has been an excruciating and colossal waste of time.
I can only speak from my own experience, and from critiques I've read online and elsewhere.
If you are only going for validation--then like anyone with ego issues, the ego issues are at fault, not the group.
In my experience, that has been the main problem. The thing is, I've never met a writer who doesn't have ego issues. Everyone at the critique table knows this, so...
They offer vague criticism with even vaguer solutions, not wanting to hurt the writer's feelings and not wanting to be targeted for retaliation. Or, worse, they offer blind accolades, expecting (and getting) some of the same when their turn comes around.
I can't say "most" critique groups work like this, though. Only the ones I've had the misfortune to come in contact with.
Jon--
Here's the difference: I'm paying for an honest appraisal from someone who reads scripts for a living. We're not friends or colleagues. We'll never have to come in contact with each other ever again once our business transaction is over. She gets cash from me, and (based on the research I've done and the samples of her work I've seen) I know exactly what to expect in return. She has absolutely no reason to pull punches, and that's absolutely what I need.
I'm not a fan of being photographed under any circumstances. A "personal stylist" would probably send me over the edge (or them over the edge, just as likely).
What do I need?
A book contract for 2008 would be a start.
Jude:
It's all in how you look at it. Money isn't some equalizer. A person who makes their living selling critiques sometimes has a vested interest in making sure they get return business. Handing someone your greenbacks guarantees you nothing--not honesty, not pulling no punches. She may pull no punches. Then again, if she's clever, she can eviscerate you just enough and stroke your ego just enough, that it feels like you got a lot of bang for your buck. She can be brutal in spots that feel, for you, like you got your money's worth, but just flattering enough that she makes you feel you have something there. It's not a judgment of this individual, just that it's naive to think that method somehow is better by the fact that monetary exchange is involved. It doesn't invoke into it some honesty. It CAN be, just as there are groups that CAN be. But there's no power in the dollar being involved.
That said, maybe the groups you attended were a collossal waste of time. I said you get what you put in. Given the cutting manner you chose to respond, I can't imagine you went in open, though perhaps you did. Your buddy J.A. Konrath is over on his blog touting groups as a wonderful tool. He has a high-level deal and has spent a lot of his time offering all the insights he has as a service to newbie writers . . . and this is something he advocates.
Yes, writer all have egos. But you know, a group invested in your success--in which YOU have invested in THEIR and the group's success--offers every bit the chance of valuable critiquing. No money is exchanging hands--just the support of fellow writers. In my group, the writers are achieving a high level of professional success, are "in talks" with big houses, have representation, etc. And not for one second have I EVER offered a blind accolade expecting one in return. I want brutal honesty--and I GIVE it, and then receive it. But there's a caveat. I avoid speaking to my fellow writers in a manner that drips with sarcasm and snideness. You can be honest and pull no punches--and yet still find a way to word it that isn't imperious, that finds merit in another human being's writing and passion and word choice. I don't know why some people think honest means . . . being snarky or whatever. But some people do. So maybe if you sat in on my group, you'd think we, too, were an excrutiating body of folk--but then again, the proof is in our results.
I swear, it's just like a $%^ novelist to keep us in suspense. May? That's not that long from now! When are you going to tell us, Erica???
:-p
PS: Jude, I haven't seen a great critique group yet, but I definitely believe they exist! One I sat in on read everything out loud, which put me to sleep (not because of the content, but because my mind does that). The other spent two hours talking about how to fit a story to the genre (I'm more of a genre but sort of writer, and this drove me crazy.), and the one read my work out loud. Let me tell you, it sounded really good when she read it out loud. It, unfortunately, was not as good as she made it sound, LOL.
All of them were great people and very smart, but, I just didn't see much that would be helpful. I'm too contrary. If they said try X, I'd have to come up with a way to solve the problem with Y. And I'd be really up a creek if they suggested X, Y, and Z, LOL.
Hi Spy:
I'll tell you guys soon. Promise.
And I forgot to add one thing. I think there's great value in critiques. In groups. And I humbly believe that there are GREAT groups out there. And I have been in one that sucked. And so you know what I did? Started my own. Nurtured it. For 14 years! I created an environment to be healthy and honest. . . . and we've screwed up along the way, I'm sure. But you know, you can always START a writers' group that has qualities you are seeking.
E
Mark:
I may very well send this stylist over the edge.
My head shots (front page of my site) were done at home--I was comfortable. But this is different, definitely. There's a colossal fear of "PLEASE don't let the picture suck." :-)
E
What I need is a critique group. Mine keep dissolving. Many of them keep giving up on writing or are otherwise flaky. I have a few people to trade critiques with, but no one I've really clicked with. But I'm determined...
Hi Book Lady:
Good luck. I think they're worth the investment. Obviously, some who have visited today think not. But the good ones are out there.
:-)
E
"So are you going on the record as needing sex? ;-)"
LOL. Thought I already did that yesterday. But I'm not like, Spy. Don't have be all SURROUNDED by it. *winks at Spy*
Ah, who my kidding. I've been married too long. I have a baby-O when he picks up his own socks!
Hmm, Book Lady, maybe we need to talk!!!
Hey, Erica!
I need honesty around me. I can deal with bad paragraphs, etc, and if I know what isn't working I fix it. My editor talks straight, and we click.
And I need laughter, which is why I love your blog and others I visit. And I must've missed a doozy yesterday, talkin' sex over here? LOL.
lainey:
Mine hasn't mastered the sock thing. But I have four kids, so clearly he's mastered others.
:-)
E
ladonna:
Mine is straight, frank, but gracious. I adore her.
E
Erica--
I don't disagree with anything you've said. From the beginning, I said your critique group sounds great. I still think so!
I know all the pitfalls of hiring an editor, or a book doctor, or a screenplay coverage/analysis service, and I would recommend that any writer be very careful about giving money to anyone. There are plenty of snakes out there who'll take you for a ride. Do your research; spend your money carefully.
As for critique groups...honestly, I think a newbie writer's time is better spent reading a lot and writing a lot. THEN, after you've achieved a certain level of proficiency with craft and a certain level of knowledge regarding genre and market, you can bring that to the table and find or start a group similar to Erica's. If you want to.
But there are no short cuts, no magic bullets. A critique group will not in any way substitute for the blood, sweat, and tears it takes for many writer's to get published.
People like JA Konrath didn't get a book deal because of any critique group. In fact, I'm pretty sure he never belonged to one prior to becoming published. He has friends now like Barry Eisler and Marcus Sakey he can call up when he's stuck, but before he got published I'm pretty sure he went at it alone. He read a lot and wrote a lot (he wrote 8 or 9 novels before he finally got a deal), and that made the difference.
Not that you're ever stuck for ideas, but if you ever run out of things to blog about someday (hah!), that'd be a really helpful blog. (How to start a critique group and stuff. I'm sure there's a whole load of stuff after the starting, LOL.)
I love critiques, I really do. I don't want to give the wrong impression. Just my experience with the particular group (and ever-changing, so it was like three groups) was that it's better to find one brilliant person, LOL. Hearing about your group, though, makes me wish we could eavesdrop sometime, see what it's like. :-)
Hi Jude:
I wouldn't characterize a writers' group as a shortcut. I think of it as a potential teaching tool. To be totally honest . . . I have edited fiction to the tune of $2,000 to as high as $10,000 (on that one, nearly a total gut job and a writer who couldn't focus and a publisher with a FIRM hardcover release date). That is big money, and I feel I am paid what I am worth in terms of an hourly rate or a per/page rate. And when new writers come to me sometimes wanting to be edited, I ASSURE them having an editor will make their book better . . . but it WON'T guarantee a deal. I always tell them FIRST try a writers' group before you even think of hiring a pro. So that if they are motivated, they can learn just as much in a writers' group. It may take longer, but if you go awhile, you will spot the leaders, the people who've been at it a while, and even just by listening, you will glean some gems. So . . . it's just what I choose to advocate. Not everyone can sit in a room, read and write a lot, and learn it all. Jane Bluestein, an educator whose books I used to edit, said we all have different learning styles, which is why I took offense at your "waste of time" comment. YOU learn the way you do. There are writers who learn by talking process. Writers who learn by hearing their stuff read aloud. Writers who learn in a classroom. Writers who learn . . . you get the idea.
E
Spy:
LOL! As you can see, I subject you all to my morning stream of consciousness every day. Not kidding that I write them in ten minutes. It's either what's in my brain when I wake and feel mildly "manic" (not in a climinal sense, but my brain is bursting in the a.m.) or what I think about as I do my 4 or 5 mile walk. I never have to come up with something. This is the sorry view of the inside of my brain. ;-)
E
I have a couple of CP/Readers that I rely upon to get the basics... but I think that I am missing something basic to my writing that they are not hitting upon.
I have yet to find a group that I can really fit with. I was a part of a really good group, but their schedule was extremely aggressive and I could not keep up with their schedule. I also felt that my critiques were sub-par for the group. I really want to find a group in my area but the South OC is apparently not the place for writers.
What I need is a local group that can meet regularly that would be honest about the craft and what works and what doesn't... maybe too much to ask.
Hi ewoh:
Start one.
Advertise on Craig's List.
:-)
E
Post a Comment