Tuesday, August 05, 2008

Bubble

I live in a bubble.

Like a lot of writers, I spend an inordinate amount of time alone. Well, it's what passes for alone with Demon Baby and three other kids. I live in my head a lot, and sometimes, I have to say, I feel much safer there.

Oh, I venture out. I got a call yesterday that the local food bank is in serious trouble. Turning people away. So yeah, a food drive is immediately in order. I have my friends. But very often, if you feel as sensitive as a tuning fork or a divining rod, you learn to stay where you feel it's safe. For me, that safe spot is more often teaching ESL to immigrants or going to the food bank than it is at social events with people who seem to have so much and give so little--and worse, seem to define strange values for the children, who are meaner than snakes sometimes.

So into my little arrangement in the world comes being a writer. I haven't Googled myself in well over a year, maybe more. Two years? I don't even know. Maybe even longer than that. Occasionally, Oldest Daughter will tell me something (like there is a fan page for me on Facebook, which is very cool). But generally, the bubble system works fine--for real life and for publishing life.

I answer every email I receive from readers--so it's not like I don't respond at all. I answer them all, even the ones who occasionally "yell" at me (got one of those two weeks ago from someone who was not happy about an ending). So yesterday . . . JVZ sent me this link.

That sound you heard yesterday was, I am sure, collective shock in the book world. Breaking Dawn came out, and the fan reviews are largely heinous. Don't read the reviews if you don't want spoilers--but you can see the breakdown on ratings. It's not even like they are breaking down into a bunch of mid-range reviews. Meyer's fans either like it--or overwhelmingly LOATHE it. Not just a middle-of-the road "meh." They HATE it. I read the spoilers (of course, I did! I read last pages of books first), and I would say that I can totally get where the angry ones are coming from.

And I gotta wonder what that must be like. Does she know? I would guess yes. Her publisher's got to be freaking out. The people who are bringing out the MOVIE of the first one can't be thrilled.

Now, on the one hand, as of this writing, over a thousand people have already reviewed it. It's number 1 on Amazon. But I wonder what the author owes her readers to give them the ending they wanted or needed. Should authors live in a bubble of their own choosing, completely unswayed by fans? There are readers seriously questioning if she even wrote the book.

Even if you are not published yet, I wonder . . . would you be prepared for THAT kind of reaction? I know I wouldn't. I have a hard enough time when readers yell at me--and that's me getting maybe twenty or thirty emails a week (when I don't have a new release), and maybe once a month someone gives me grief. I like my bubble just fine, thanks. I have a November release from Red Dress Ink. I already know there are going to be mad people. You don't make God a woman and have no one react. You sure as heck don't mock the Hail Mary football pass (involving betting and the Virgin Mary). You don't have demons who like sushi and angels who like a shot of whiskey. You don't stick Albert Einstein in drag. You just don't--and not expect to hear from SOMEONE whose sensibilities you have seriously pissed off.

So thoughts? I know some writers are like, "I would just be thrilled to have Meyer's kind of money and her number of readers." But I don't know. Could you stand people sort of uniformly being furious at you? In real life it's hard enough--but this is your BOOK. It's your BABY!

Discuss.

26 comments:

Mark Terry 8:31 AM, August 05, 2008  

The question of whether the author needs to be true to their vision or true to their readers is always a tough one. Actually, though, in the case of Ms. Meyer, at least her books appear to be read.

What puzzles me and disgusts me is when a writer like JK Rowling or Dan Brown (and I've seen it with Stephen King) get ripped by people who've never read their books. I remember vividly when a prominent Michigan book reviewer went on about how lousy a writer JK Rowling was on a listserv, and then he finally admitted he'd only read a chapter or two of the first book.

I'm guessing she'll bounce back. I don't know, though. I tend to have fairly thick skin (sort of), but I've been surprised by writers like, say, Tess Gerritsen, who really seems to let the criticisms get to her.

I'm inclined to think of the Bob Dylan quote, "You're nobody if you've never been booed."

Anonymous 8:50 AM, August 05, 2008  

"If you feel as sensitive as a tuning fork or a divining rod, you learn to stay where you feel it's safe."

That echoes the way I am too. I wonder if it's that way it is for most writers?

Jude Hardin 9:11 AM, August 05, 2008  

It seems some of the fans think a YA author is obligated to "send the right message" to teenagers. I'm not sure that's true. A book should entertain, and perhaps contain thought-provoking themes, but I don't think we as writers are ethically bound to produce books didactic in nature. I think the YA audience is fairly sophisticated these days. Many times it's the grownups who need to get a clue.

I think Stephanie probably knew she would catch some flak with this one. I doubt if she's losing any sleep over it. I don't think I would.

Erica Orloff 9:18 AM, August 05, 2008  

Mark:
I agree. I think there are some wonderful writers who get ripped because they are successful, just as I feel there are some very successful writers who I think are hacks.

As for Tess . . . I so GET it. I really do. I won't even say it's a gender thing--maybe a personality type.
E

Erica Orloff 9:20 AM, August 05, 2008  

Joe:
I know writers with HUGE egos. I especially know because I've worked as a ghostwriter and editor. So . . . I don't know that it's a writer thing. It is THIS writer's thing (meaning me)--and it is how I am in real life, too. :-)
E

Erica Orloff 9:21 AM, August 05, 2008  

Jude:
According to JVZ, she is VERy sensitive and combs blogs and fan sites all the time, reading what's said about her. For someone like that, it's got to be doubly tough.

And I don't think any of the negative reviews are about PC. Or just few of them anyway. They seem to be about betrayal of character.

E

Edie Ramer 9:37 AM, August 05, 2008  

I read a few of the reviews, and SM and her editor must have been aware a lot of readers would hate that ending.

As for your book coming out in Nov., I am eager to read it, Erica! It sounds like just the kind of book I love.

Anonymous 9:39 AM, August 05, 2008  

I saw Stephenie Meyer on some morning show, and although she said she wouldn't care if it was all gone tomorrow, I would think that such a negative reaction to her book would be daunting. Her publisher is going to question not only themselves, for believing in the story, but probably in whatever she comes up with next.

Yes, the book is probably selling more due to the negative publicity, but I'd rather have 100 people read my book and love it, than 1000 people read it and hate it. OK, I say that now...maybe if it all impacted a bottom line I'd sing a different song.

As for being solitary -- that's the thing about being a writer that sometimes "gets" to me. I'm a people person and 100% of my writer-contact is via the internet. Probably why I'm always emailing friends and reading blogs and websites. I long to connect. I also do not live with another adult (I know sometimes it's not all it's cracked up to be) but I often miss that.

E, I think you're highly evolved. I would think that in a beginning career an author would google, check reviews etc. I know that I write for a newspaper, in the opinions section, and have stopped reading the online comments attached to my stories -- I was sorry that I ever realized they were there (which was a year after I started this gig).

Anonymous 11:25 AM, August 05, 2008  

Hey Erica, I love my bubble too! Also, my daughter has been waiting for the new SM novel. Hope she's happy with the ending. Too bad the reviews were so negative. Hopefully, SM can weather the storm. She'll need a bubble of her own, I bet.

Your new book sounds like a winner, Erica. My kinda read!

Erica Orloff 11:30 AM, August 05, 2008  

edie:
Yes. It can't be a total shock.

And thanks! I'm nervous about this book--because I love it most, I think. :-)
E

Erica Orloff 11:31 AM, August 05, 2008  

amy:
I can't imagine nto caring one bit if it disappeared, but that's also not a sound-bite answer.

As for opinions . . . I just can't "be mean" so I don't understand some snark and so on that's out there. Just not for me, so I stay away.
E

Erica Orloff 11:32 AM, August 05, 2008  

ladonna:
Well, between you and Edie then, I have two sales. ;-) Maybe my mom will buy it. But she won't read it. LOL! Not her "thing."
E

Zoe Winters 2:06 PM, August 05, 2008  

hehe Erica, I don't know about everybody else, but I'm totally buying your November release. I'd be far more enamored with angels if they all drank whiskey. It's kind of sexy.

Anyway... I know LKH has "negative fans" in droves, and they keep buying her books just because of morbid fascination. Though I think secretly they're turned on by the vamp and were-porn and are justifying their purchases by pointing out the problems of the books, like it's for a critique class.

I think causing that much passion about a book is a good thing and I don't think it's ultimately going to hurt movie sales. Things like this thrive on controversy. But I do feel it's sad that Ms. Meyers has become one of the writers people have decided isn't a real person because she's gotten so rich and famous.

It's the price of riches and fame, and though I would be lying if I said I didn't someday want to hit a bestseller list, it's an awfully heavy price. It would be hard to take.

Zoe Winters 2:08 PM, August 05, 2008  

Then again, I'm sure when it starts to get that loud, the writer becomes a little insulated against specific comments by virtue of all the layers of gatekeepers between her and the public.

A hurtful comment is a hurtful comment whether it's said by one or a thousand and one.

Erica Orloff 2:37 PM, August 05, 2008  

Zoe:
I guess I feel like I could be JK Rowling famous or "Twilight" famous and it would still be troublesome that some people didn't just not enjoy the book but LOATHED it. And not just a couple--whom you could always say are the random crackpots--but lots and lots.

It's a strange dynamic.
E

Heather Harper 2:39 PM, August 05, 2008  

With her ginourmous fanbase, I don't see how she could have pleased every reader. Especially the ones who are "team Jacob".

I feel awful for her because I think she is such a talent.

This reminds me of a lot of the fans who gave up on The Anita Blake series by Laurell K. Hamilton once the books shifted in tone. I wasn't crazy about the new direction, but I still think she is a damn good writer.

People evolve, characters evolve.
We don't get to be architect to another author's story.

Ewoh Nairb 3:16 PM, August 05, 2008  

I know that no matter what I write, it will not be for everyone. When people have read my poetry in the past, I have had reactions in the extreme negative. I can't say it didn't hurt, but I really didn't let it mean anything about me.

I hope that I can keep to that high road when I reach the point of publication with a novel... see, I said 'when' and not 'if' :)

The one thing I focus on is that for the negative reviewer/commenter/whatever, the statement they are making is all about them, and usually has nothing whatsoever to do with me, or whomever they are slamming. They have an axe to grind and it is usually random whom they pick on.

Growing up I found that I didn't like the way many books were written as far as where the author took the story... but instead of getting mad at the author, I just started writing the story I wanted to read.

I may be oversimplifying or be naive, but it works for me.

Erica Orloff 4:13 PM, August 05, 2008  

Hi Heather:
I agree. You can't make everyone happy. But the sheer level of unhappiness is pretty astounding. It reminds me of when Anne Rice's fans started to turn against her.
E

Erica Orloff 4:14 PM, August 05, 2008  

Brian:
I don't think you are oversimplifying at all. With the Internet and blogs and so on, it's pretty amazing to me how WORKED UP people can get over things.

E

The Anti-Wife 4:44 PM, August 05, 2008  

How could anyone not be affected by the negative feedback. You'd have to have the skin of an alligator and the brain of an emu not to feel hurt. I wonder why she ended it as she did. What was her intent?

Erica Orloff 5:42 PM, August 05, 2008  

anti-wife:
I agree. How could you NOT have any reaction at all?

As for why? You know, there are theories . . . but I don't want to guess at 'em here since they involve spoilers.

Hope you're all recovered, by the way!!!
E

Spy Scribbler 11:24 PM, August 05, 2008  

Oh! I'm sorry, if I had been around the blogosphere earlier today I would've linked you, too. Totally didn't mean to ignore your contribution (probably best contribution) to the discussion. I think I read the blogs really early, then it's been non-stop work until now.

Watching this makes me sick to my stomach, pretty much. I even tried to come up with a theory today that would spare the author, LOL, but... what can you do? I would definitely be telling DH he had to hold me for hours, if this happened to me!

I try to be attuned to what needs, desires, fears, and hopes of my readers I'm tapping into with my story. When one plays on those feelings with a story, one has a responsibility to do their best, in general, to make sure they don't betray what they've tapped into. And the ending should always be respectful of the emotional/story promise made, and imho, have roots and a foundation throughout the story, whether it be a surprise, twist, or whatever.

There's a line, though, obviously.

If it's just lazy writing, well I returned a book for the same thing once. I once read a book halfway, well-done, wonderful. Bought it, brought it home, and the ending was so sloppy and ridiculous I returned it. It really was that bad, not just a matter of not being my thing. The ending, plot-wise, was even what I expected and wanted, just sloppily done.

Suzanne 12:23 AM, August 06, 2008  

This whole process of submission and rejection, hope and despair has grown me a pretty thick skin so I'm not sure I would be devastated by it but it would sure hurt.
She must have thought long and hard about the direction she would take with this last book and to find she had made the wrong choices for so many people must be heart-breaking. I just hope she is not too sensitive.

Erica Orloff 8:44 AM, August 06, 2008  

Hi Spy:
It's certainly been a controversy that has been interesting to watch. I didn't know people were retuning the books en masse!
E

Erica Orloff 8:45 AM, August 06, 2008  

Hi Suzanne:
I know I changed my ending to Do They Wear High Heels in Heaven several times . . . back and forth, until I was sure I was comfortable with what I did. You're right, I am sure it's upsetting to her.
E

Anonymous 1:56 AM, February 10, 2009  

Without hesitate, I bought Tibia Gold , in the game I can find myself. So I buy Tibia coins . At present, think the happy day I spend in tibia, I am eager to enter it, and buy Tibia money . Own tibia gp , it means that you own the life of happiness. So I will not leave Tibia Platinum .


  © Blogger template Brooklyn by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP