Battle Hymn of the Russian Daughter
I felt like, since I blog so often about writing and motherhood and life, that I wanted to blog on the controversy surrounding the Chua memoir.
I don't mother that way. Instead, I mother in a messy, mushy, cry-at-ever-single-Christmas-pageant-and-pre-school-extravaganza slightly hippie/Buddhist quoting, chaotic way. But it's not as if I was raised this way.
I was raised by a strict Russian father. When I brought home a 98 on a test, his response was, "If you studied a little harder, you would have gotten 100." I have been yelled at over math grades and pushed until I thought I would throw up from the pressure sometimes. I skipped my senior year of high school and went off to college on a scholarship where I triple majored (because double majors are for slackers) with a minor in creative writing. My Significant Other loathes that I say to my kids, over a bad grade, "Well, did you try?" and then shrug. I have looked teachers straight in the eyes when they have commented on x or y about my kids, "I don't care." Because I don't. I care that they turn out to be decent human beings who know how to love and laugh, who always know, in their heart of hearts, that they are loved fiercely. But Significant Other will point to results of Tiger Russian Father upbringing as if that is some proof that if you want achievers, you push them relentlessly.
My dad has moved in with me now. Every day, that Tiger Father rears its head. I am told--every day, often--all the things I am doing wrong. I am not a clean enough housekeeper, or a strict enough mother. I apparently know nothing about finances, and don't know enough how to winterize my lawn, or that the house may blow up at ANY MOMENT because of a gas leak. And I smile and nod.
Because there is a difference between Chua's story and my own.
He's mentioning the gas leak because he fears I will perish. The clean house because it will be better for us all if I am neater. He LOVES us all together and wants us to have a happy life. Behind every criticism is the idea that he loves us all and is still the patriarch, even if it seems like I take care of him more now.
On the flip side of every time I was pushed were the times when he called EVERYONE (and I do mean everyone) that he knew from his old neighborhood to tell them I won the scholarship. It was that he flew sometimes across multiple time-zones on planes for 30 hours back to back to never miss a birthday. He wrote postcards to me from Vietnam and Nigeria and all these strange places he traveled. He once, though he had never done anything outdoorsy in his life, went on a hike with my Girl Scout troop and came home with bleeding blisters. He taught me how to score a boxing match. He taught me how to play craps. And mostly, he told me he loved me, and THAT I never doubted.
When he hangs up the phone with me now . . . that's what he says, "I love you." Every time. And so as I watch this publishing/media firestorm, what I seem to come away with is this . . . I don't think Chua did her children a disservice by never letting them have play dates. I can even "sit" with the idea that she pushed them to achieve by demanding they practice piano for hours. Not my way to parent, but fine. No, it's that I don't get the sense, when she is ripping their birthday cards in front of their faces for not being up to her standards, or any of the other sound-bite friendly moments in the book, that I ever think that message of love comes through. Her love seems capricious, EARNED through achievement. And that, to me, is what sits so uneasily with me.
I am blessed beyond belief with my children. They may sometimes make choices I wish they didn't. But in the end, the lessons of family I learned in my childhood is they have your back when the rest of the world doesn't. And in the end, you don't earn it. It just is.

12 comments:
I think what doesn't come across in all these firestorms, LOL, is that the memoir is actually about her journey away from the style of parenting she started out with. It's actually about her comeuppance with that style of parenting that she did in the beginning, and how it didn't work for her youngest daughter and how she changed.
Actually, most of the Chinese mothers I worked with made their kids excel, but they worked so hard to make it fun and inspire their children. There's a bit of Tai Chi/bend sort of dance they do that's fantastic, too, and I'm not sure they're aware of it, since it's so normal to them. But all Chinese mothers are different, of course.
Natasha:
HOWEVER . . . she is, since the firestorm, and I consider this marketing, not backing down an inch and sort of getting MORE in your face about it/defensive. I have Asian friends and mothers who pushed their kids in violin, but it was also with a dose of affection. I don't think the memoir comes across that way. I do think it was intentionally "in your face" a bit and confrontational, but she does come across as narcissistic and controlling. I think it works for controversy to write that way (hello, Anna Coulter?), but as a "my parenting way is better" I don't think she comes across well, versus, I DO think I could write about my strict upbringing and you wouldn't get that same in-your-face attitude. But that sort of writing makes for a best-seller.
I'll have to check it out. That's something I could never do, for sure! The one response I heard her make was that she said she didn't choose the inflammatory title (Why Chinese Mothers Are Better or something) and the memoir is about her comeuppance... but I haven't read it, so I don't know.
Natasha:
HER WORDS:
“In retrospect, these coaching suggestions seem a bit extreme,” she writes in the book after describing how she once threatened to burn her daughter’s stuffed animals if she did not play a piano composition perfectly. “On the other hand, they were highly effective.”
Sorry, but I can't find any decent defense of that. It's emotionally abusive. Like I said, I don't care about sleepovers, not being allowed to watch TV (ALL my TV was monitored) and the rest. But these things held us as "effective"--well, so is torture at Gitmo, at times. Doesn't make it right.
I can agree with that. :-) (Your words, not hers.)
Natasha:
It makes for good press. Not good parenting, in my humble opinion.
I see some of the kids at school from certain families (not always Chinese or anything in particular) and the children do well in school, but they don't relate to their peers, they don't smile, they don't seem to understand fun.
I read the article (not realizing there's a book) and I thought, "Yeah, so your kid can play her recital perfectly. But what is she missing?" Because it's all a give and take, it's all a balance, even when it comes to kids' personalities.
My son struggles desperately in school. He often doesn't try. He acts dopey so much (man, dopey. He's 12). But he manages to use the most eloquent, mature language when he describes interpersonal relationships between kids. EVERYONE comments on his certain touch there. Not that he has great relationships, he struggles there too, but he observes and listens and thinks. He also is fiercely HIMSELF and that, in the end, is the best thing I can give him.
Drives my husband crazy cuz he has no "work ethic". I'm all, Yeah, lets make him play drums until he hates it. Great.
who always know, in their heart of hearts, that they are loved fiercely
I think that's the most important thing you can do for your children: love them and make sure they know it. Their confidence and self esteem depend heavily on it, without which they might not accomplish anything anyway.
Eloquent as always.
On the other end of the spectrum, I was not pushed or prodded or challenged, although I was definitely encouraged and supported and loved. I do have known expectations of my own kids -- and that's to be the best they can be -- which to me includes being well-rounded, honest, good hearted people as well as good students.
My daughter *once* got a D on a test. She was devastated. I said, "It happens." I promised her if it happened again and she'd done her best, she'd get a tutor -- because that's what she wanted.
It's all about balance and that's what troubles me about this whole Tiger Mom nonsense. I frankly have enough to do without worrying or caring how anyone else raises their children. They can deal with that in therapy when they're older. And I'm sure they will.
Starbucks:
I know people in their 40s and 50s who follow along with whatever is the current opinion, who are afraid to stand for what is right or just, and do not know who they are or what they stand for. Seems to me your child is already worlds evolved.
Stephen:
I agree . . . unconditional love gives a child a rock of a foundation.
Amy:
Yes, I agree . . . It's the whole "my way is better"--and I find it kind of disgusting she would use these sound bite outrageous comments to get media attention and sell books. She knows exactly what she's doing. And is using her children to do so.
Post a Comment