Reality Bites
Last night, I talked to a dear friend, and because she and I did not live near each other for many years (though now we do and I will see her Friday), I had never really told her the story of some of the toxic familial relations on three of my kids' father's side. As I recounted what was said to me, what was emailed to me, what was DONE to my children and so on, it really sounded like a cariacture. If I WROTE a family situation like my poor children have with their father's family, no one would believe it.
I am editing a book--nonfiction. And I have my suspicions that one particularly toxic story is very much true. The details ring so "real" in some ways, that I don't believe it has been fictionalized for the purposes of telling a story to illustrate a point. But I wrote the author and said, "I think you have to change this . . . no one would believe it." NOT because I don't believe it . . . but because it's so toxic as to border on madness.
I read a PW review of a book this morning in which the reviewer said the characters "bordered on parody." I have read the book and found the characters charming.
That's the tricky thing with fiction. I have gotten into more mild arguments with critique partners, my editors, myself (nothing like arguing with yourself) over motivations and characters and so on . . . on this and this alone. The believability issue.
I think newer writers find this particularly galling. In other words, we ALL know people capabale of being yes, THAT horrid, and yes, THAT eccentric. But put them in a fictional world and it starts to stretch readers' minds as far as believability.
Now here's the other side. I have written about people who dismember family members and about mob princesses and bookies and realms that most people don't know too much about. Somehow, if you set the world up just right . . . that's okay. Readers believe it. Why?
Banality.
I have come to the conclusion watching the behaviors of people who are really just ugly at times . . . that many people's cruelties are banal. As if they are blithely unaware they are rude or mean. Do I REALLY think the snarky woman who finds a way to insult to me at cocktail parties has nothing better to do than think of insults on my mothering skills? If I repeated to her what she said now, months after the fact, she would likely say, "I never said that." Or . . . "I must have been kidding." Or, like the lady who moved out of the neighborhood, I have a sneaking suspicion that excuse would be, "I must have been drunk." Some people's cruelties are completely banal. They don't even think about them. They don't lose sleep. They just wander through life that way.
But in a fictional world, writers set up REASONS for dismemberment and cruelty. We very often even give serial killers motivations of some sort (look what Thomas Harris did when he RUINED the Hannibal Lechter franchise). Give reasons . . . and people will BELIEVE your fiction.
But real life? A lot more banal.
Thoughts? Have you ever realized you simply couldn't use perfectly good "material" because no one would believe it? And what do you think about the banality of real-life versus fictional life?

29 comments:
It goes back to one of the best lessons I learned when I tried my hand at fiction. It must be believable. Be that a fantastical world full of dragons and magic or a family in the suburbs. I think readers need to be able to grab onto a characters motivations and understand them even if they don't like them.
In real life, things happen all the time that we don't understand. Sometimes people take the easy way out, act cowardly or are just boring. None of that makes for a good book. I tried writing a memoir about 4 years ago. Mundane. The way I mined my own life for a good story was to write fiction - to use my experiences to offer my characters motivations and actions that had no basis in reality, but hopefully are believable.
Like you, I have situations here that make people's mouths drop open. I would never write about it - not only is it too private - no one would believe it.
Which is exactly why I write fiction. It's a challenge and a pleasure to invent the believable.
Hi Amy:
Yeah . . . I suppose that is some of it. People just do a lot of "huh?" things . . . and THEY don't even know their motivations. This one woman who has said some rude things to me . . . I think she likes being the Queen Bee. WHY that is? Not sure. Does she realize that when she insults people? I doubt it. But in a fictional world, we can't leave a main character having no idea why they do they things they do.
It really is like being a shrink for your characters.
E
I don't know who said it. I'm thinking Hemingway, but probably not. It was along the lines of: the biggest difference between fiction and real life is that fiction has to make sense.
And yes, I've had people read something I wrote and say, "I don't believe that could happen" and I'm forced into a "yeah, but..." situation where I say, "But, uh, that's based on real life."
Which isn't, unfortunately, a good enough reason to include it in fiction. Fiction has to make sense. Life doesn't (and often doesn't make sense).
Mark:
I find the biggest stumbling block is rarely (in my writing) the events, but the motivations. No one in fiction wants to read a character who does something "just because."
Interestingly, a character in Freudian Slip does something awful, and he says it's because "he can." I wondered if people would have a problem with that. But I sometimes find with immature individuals, that simply is the reason. doesn't seem like much of one, but there it is.
E
There is a point in fiction where you go from believable to a point where the reader ceases to suspend his fact checker and the story stops making sense. Going past that point, the reader again tries to make sense of the madness.
I wrote a short story about a massage going terribly wrong, ending up with my wife strapped to a lethal injection table, naked, hair caught in the ceiling fan, and spinning around the room. The only way to free her was with a giant pair of scissors, cutting a chunk of hair from her head and sending her flying through the window and landing in our neighbor's yard. Fortunately, she was able to use her legs for rudders and was able to avoid the picnic table and our neighbors who were picnicing on the lawn.
For the first year, at least once a month, I got an email from someone asking if that story was true.
People believe the sublime. It takes longer to get there, but that is one of the things that makes humor work.
Leave something out? Not if I can modify it further.
YMMV
Allen:
Humor writing (and I started in chick lit) definitely pushes the envelope. It's usally a question of . . . Murphy's Law and just taking everything to extremes. I also think people are more apt to believe EVENTS than motivation-less BEHAVIOR. But I could be wrong . . . .
E
I believe Tom Clancy said that, Mark.
If you can create three-dimensional characters and paint their internal and external worlds convincingly, readers are likely to climb on board for just about any concept, no matter how fantastic. Magickeepers is a good example.
I don't know. I think that if you do it a certain way, if you ease people into it, and allow them to stretch slowly, then people are willing to go along for the ride. Like cooking lobsters and starting with cool water. Heat it up slowly enough, and they don't even scream. (Have you ever heard lobsters scream?) My dad has a macabre sense of humor. Ruined lobsters for me.
I think that you really hit the nail on the head. In real life people just do things without really thinking, but in novels everything must be justified.
Maybe that's why (to use the second cliche of the comment) people say that fact is stranger than fiction. Facts can be strange, but fiction needs motivation.
Jude:
I think fantasy is its own special breed as far as that goes. Though I do know I tried to be matter-of-fact about the magic. In their world, it just is.
E
I had a bit of this with my memoir (buried in a drawer somewhere) but since I tried to keep it humorous, it's easier to believe the wacky stuff.
Heather:
Thankfully . . . no. LOL! And I am allergic to lobster, so perhaps I will never hear them scream. :-)
And I agree . . . one technique is to weave the characters and world slowly, reeling people in.
E
Lauren:
I totally agree with you. I can't fathom some motivations of people I know--or even people my kids are related to. Have ZERO idea. And I also, I guess . . . don't want to waste spiritual energy finding reasons that only try to justify vicious or bad behavior. It's better than I DON'T know why they do the things they do.
But in fiction, we are driven to know.
E
melanie:
My real life is wacky all right.
:-)
A little over a year ago I almost had to sit on a murder trial, I was removed by the prosecutor during the final culling. (yeah!) But I happened to run into a lady (at church, in a large county--what are the odds??) who did sit on the trial. Turns out two young men robbed a fast food restaurant. The clerk recognized one of the men as a regular, so they kidnapped her, subsequently murdering her because she could ID them. They traded a theft with a deadly weapon charge for first degree murder. The kid got life in prison--no parole. He was 18 at the time of the incident.
This is what happens in real life--stupidity.
It wouldn't work in a book because there isn't any valid motivation.
Real life will always trump fiction in the insane stupidity motivation category.
Hi Magolla:
Having work with at-risk kids as a mentor . . . nothing breaks my heart as much as kids who make rash, stupid decisions that have life-altering consequences . . . and how they just DON'T THINK.
E
Someone who does it "because he can" is motivated by power.
Fiction must make sense because that is why we chose to read it. We want the comfort of control. Without motivation life is random and what is more terrifying than to realize that someone died because of unmotivated random circumstances?
Clues are physical evidence. Motive is not a clue.
~ Carol Wheat, writing teacher
Richmond:
GREAT quote!!!!
You've become like Yoda around here. Every time you drop by . . . lots of great gems.
E
I'm with you on motivation.
I often write characters who solve their problems with violence, so it's always on my mind. And I feel I'm barely touching on understanding when it comes to antagonists. SCAR is teaching me a lot about that, about damaged people and how deep that can go.
I'm figuring out one of my antagonists (a mother who lost her baby to violence, so she has some pretty good excuses for doing the things she does). But the other is damaged nearly beyond belief. She's a cutter, she's narcissistic, she's practical, and very good at exacting revenge. Revenge is a way of life for her and her tribe (like they say on Sons of Anarchy "Retribution is what we do."
(I think I shall steal her final revenge from her, though, bwahahaha). She was raised in desperate times, often hungry, faced with a life of constant battle, and now is in charge of her tribe, trying to feed them, keep their loyalty, and save them from the Crusade. It's tough going for her, but I still wonder if she's motivated enough.
So that's where I question myself: not what they do, but why?
I taught for fifteen years in a school for at risk teens and dealt with lots of intense situations. When I resigned to write full-time I wrote a YA novel set in an alternative school. And sure I got ideas from my experiences but the story is at best a drastically twisted version of anything that acutally happened. But hopefully it rings true on an emotional level.
Richard Peck said something like: "A story is not what happened but what might have happened."
starbucks:
Human beings do random things. They can leave their true motivations hidden; they can do so involuntarily (i.e., they may really NOT know why). I don't think fictional characters have that luxury.
E
Paul:
Great quote!
E
I'm sorry about Queen Bees. Chagrin Falls was full of them. Some of the mothers had these HUGE SMILES, HUMONGOUS SMILES, (even when they hadn't paid the bill) and they could manage to say the most cutting things while appearing to be SUPER NICE. (Me not having kids was a favorite to slice me up with.) I don't know why and never understand their motivation at all. (Must look up definition of banality.) Like when I put up tons of Christmas or Halloween decorations for the kids, they'd say it was hard to drive into the driveway with the candy canes (or whatnot). (Even though they were in the GRASS outside the driveway.) They REALLY HATED that their kids liked me, and they'd set up all these "contests" I wouldn't know anything about.
They always speak and hear between the lines. I'm either too dumb, or I didn't get that gene. Or both, LOL.
Nastasha:
The comments I get are about Demon Baby (mostly). As a mommy blogger, I get that. But the blog is a love letter to my child. No one knows what it is like to parent MY particular children EXCEPT me. And I parent them fiercely and don't invite anyone's advice. I've had people email me that I should spank my child. I have had people ask me what is wrong with him. They can eff themselves. Period.
The Queen Bees disagree with my parenting or with the fact that I am honest about my child being difficult or different. Or that I am hippie-ish in my peace and love style laid-back parenting. And they seem to be annoyed that I am a creative spirit who won't dress or act or BE the way that's "normal."
So it is what it is. I have no idea what it is that bugs them. But I secretly suspect it's NOTHING. I secretly suspect that being mean is just how they go about their day and it really wouldn't matter who I was or how I mothered. They would simply find something to be rude about.
So you know, they can take one of your candy canes and stick it . . .
;-)
E
LOL! Hah! That cracks me up, Erica!
It's so pervasive in our society and in our times, though. It seems that any time people can judge someone else's choice as "wrong," they feel better about themselves, sort of relieved they made the right choice. As humans, we do it incessantly. It's like humans need to proclaim something else as wrong in order to defend their own way of life. Just last week, I heard someone "defend" their lesbianism (not that I think it needs defending) by explaining that it wasn't BDSM, which was, she said, sick. I don't think she could be more acutely aware of what it feels like to be judged at this moment, and yet our first human instinct is still to turn around and judge and point fingers at someone who is "worse." It's like we need to be propped up on someone else's wrongness in order to be right.
Erica,
I have asked this before, do you know my grandmother?
You have described her so well several times in your writing.
I understand what you are going through.
And to give first hand accounts of your statement, they really do not have a clue, they think that everyone loves them. My grandmother cannot figure out why she cannot keep nurses very long(They get very tired of her bickering, rude talk, constant degrading of them and their entire family), go figure.
I have often stopped myself from saying something horrible because it has been bread into me by "The Hag", yes that is what most of the grandchildren call her.
I have even seen what it has done to my mother who married into that mess.
It is sad that people like this exists, what is worse is they often pass this on to their children.
Penguin:
Alas . . . no, I don't think I know her, but you obviously get the drill. :-)
My kids are great . . . I cannot imagine not wanting to know them.
And as I tell my oldest son, he can bring home a stripper to marry and I will find something awesome to love about her because I know what it feels like to do your best to be a loving in-law and to be treated so horrifically. So . . . whomever they bring home . . . they will become my other children, too, by marriage, and I will love them.
E
Even a serial killer? Or a republican?
BTW, for the last time, there is no h in Lecter. Don't make me come over there...
Post a Comment